Saturday, May 08, 2021
Are the 'woke social media warriors' running Starmer's Labour
I can't quite motivate myself to comment on Thursday's elections just yet, but the one trend that is clear is that voters lined up in their thousands to endorse the current governments, in what ever country they lived, and the way that the pandemic has been handled, thus accounting for the good results for the Tories in England, the SNP in Scotland and Labour in Wales. It was slightly more complicated than that of course, but in the face of countless lockdowns and restrictions on individual liberties most voters appeared to feel that we are beginning to move on and expressed their appreciation for the vaccine programme that has put us in that position.
The corollary of all that of course is worse than expected outcomes for the opposition, who might have otherwise expected to have capitalised on a mid-term Tory Government mired in allegations of sleaze. That was highlighted in particular in the Tories gaining Hartlepool, a Labour stronghold, defying all previous history and precedent to do so.
Of course not every Labour MP and Plaid Cymru MS will see it that way. One in particular has already quit the Labour frontbench in protest. The Independent reports that Labour MP Khalid Mahmood has resigned, warning that the party has been taken over by “a London-based bourgeoisie, with the support of brigades of woke social media warriors”:
The Birmingham Perry Barr MP announced his decision in the wake of the party’s crushing defeat in the former safe seat of Hartlepool, and made clear that he expected Labour also to lose the election for West Midlands mayor.
Labour sources said he had left the frontbench some weeks ago, but no announcement was made at the time.
In an article for the Policy Exchange think tank, Mr Mahmood said that Labour had moved away from working-class voters’ priorities under the leaderships of not only Starmer, but also Jeremy Corbyn and Ed Miliband.
“In the past decade, Labour has lost touch with ordinary British people,” he said.
“A London-based bourgeoisie, with the support of brigades of woke social media warriors, has effectively captured the party.
“They mean well, of course, but their politics – obsessed with identity, division and even tech utopianism – have more in common with those of Californian high society than the kind of people who voted in Hartlepool yesterday.
“The loudest voices in the Labour movement over the past year in particular have focused more on pulling down Churchill’s statue than they have on helping people pull themselves up in the world.
“No wonder it is doing better among rich urban liberals and young university graduates than it is amongst the most important part of its traditional electoral coalition, the working class.”
Mr Mahmood quoted Peter Mandelson’s account of a former Labour voter who told him on a Hartlepool doorstep: “Sort yourselves out. You picked the wrong brother and you ended up with Corbyn so that’s goodbye to you. When you’ve sorted yourselves out, we’ll look at you again.”
And he said: “It would be easy for Labour MPs and members to whinge about the unfairness of this summary of the past decade.
“But we must recognise that is how we are seen by so many people in the places that were once unfailingly loyal to us – as a party that has lost its way.
“It is only by engagement on a local level, meeting eye to eye with voters and hearing their concerns, that we will fix that. I will be doing so not from the Labour front bench, but walking the streets of my constituency as a backbencher and talking face to face with the people I have the honour to serve.”
Mr Mahmood warned that “superficial flag-waving” by the party leader would not convince voters that the Labour Party shares their sense of patriotism.
“They are more alert to rebranding exercises than spin doctors give them credit for,” he warned. “Their patriotism is about historic pride in their places, the heritage and stories of those places, and the Britishness and Englishness of the people and families that call them home.”
And he said voters’ priorities were job security, a bright future for their children and grandchildren, a well-functioning NHS, and investment in infrastructure and transport.
“There is a need for humility, to begin with,” he said.
“If Labour is to win back seats like Hartlepool it will have to change the minds of people who yesterday chose to vote Conservative.
“Is there a danger that our party, in its opposition and confusion over Brexit, has veered towards an anti-British attitude? I certainly worry that some of our previous supporters will see it that way.”
Mr Mahmood certainly has a point, and it's not my place to argue with his analysis, but whether his dissatisfaction leads to a wider meltdown within the Labour Party has yet to be seen.
The corollary of all that of course is worse than expected outcomes for the opposition, who might have otherwise expected to have capitalised on a mid-term Tory Government mired in allegations of sleaze. That was highlighted in particular in the Tories gaining Hartlepool, a Labour stronghold, defying all previous history and precedent to do so.
Of course not every Labour MP and Plaid Cymru MS will see it that way. One in particular has already quit the Labour frontbench in protest. The Independent reports that Labour MP Khalid Mahmood has resigned, warning that the party has been taken over by “a London-based bourgeoisie, with the support of brigades of woke social media warriors”:
The Birmingham Perry Barr MP announced his decision in the wake of the party’s crushing defeat in the former safe seat of Hartlepool, and made clear that he expected Labour also to lose the election for West Midlands mayor.
Labour sources said he had left the frontbench some weeks ago, but no announcement was made at the time.
In an article for the Policy Exchange think tank, Mr Mahmood said that Labour had moved away from working-class voters’ priorities under the leaderships of not only Starmer, but also Jeremy Corbyn and Ed Miliband.
“In the past decade, Labour has lost touch with ordinary British people,” he said.
“A London-based bourgeoisie, with the support of brigades of woke social media warriors, has effectively captured the party.
“They mean well, of course, but their politics – obsessed with identity, division and even tech utopianism – have more in common with those of Californian high society than the kind of people who voted in Hartlepool yesterday.
“The loudest voices in the Labour movement over the past year in particular have focused more on pulling down Churchill’s statue than they have on helping people pull themselves up in the world.
“No wonder it is doing better among rich urban liberals and young university graduates than it is amongst the most important part of its traditional electoral coalition, the working class.”
Mr Mahmood quoted Peter Mandelson’s account of a former Labour voter who told him on a Hartlepool doorstep: “Sort yourselves out. You picked the wrong brother and you ended up with Corbyn so that’s goodbye to you. When you’ve sorted yourselves out, we’ll look at you again.”
And he said: “It would be easy for Labour MPs and members to whinge about the unfairness of this summary of the past decade.
“But we must recognise that is how we are seen by so many people in the places that were once unfailingly loyal to us – as a party that has lost its way.
“It is only by engagement on a local level, meeting eye to eye with voters and hearing their concerns, that we will fix that. I will be doing so not from the Labour front bench, but walking the streets of my constituency as a backbencher and talking face to face with the people I have the honour to serve.”
Mr Mahmood warned that “superficial flag-waving” by the party leader would not convince voters that the Labour Party shares their sense of patriotism.
“They are more alert to rebranding exercises than spin doctors give them credit for,” he warned. “Their patriotism is about historic pride in their places, the heritage and stories of those places, and the Britishness and Englishness of the people and families that call them home.”
And he said voters’ priorities were job security, a bright future for their children and grandchildren, a well-functioning NHS, and investment in infrastructure and transport.
“There is a need for humility, to begin with,” he said.
“If Labour is to win back seats like Hartlepool it will have to change the minds of people who yesterday chose to vote Conservative.
“Is there a danger that our party, in its opposition and confusion over Brexit, has veered towards an anti-British attitude? I certainly worry that some of our previous supporters will see it that way.”
Mr Mahmood certainly has a point, and it's not my place to argue with his analysis, but whether his dissatisfaction leads to a wider meltdown within the Labour Party has yet to be seen.
