The news site says that the calls are part of a “day of action” aimed at highlighting the impact of strategic lawsuits against public participation (Slapps) on both local newspapers and wider society:
s Slapps, described by critics as “lawfare”, involve the rich and powerful using defamation and privacy laws to intimidate and shut down scrutiny, threatening to tie up their targets in costly legal action.
Organised by the UK Anti-Slapp Coalition, Wednesday’s campaign calls for the Government to include legislation curbing the practice in next month’s King’s Speech.
The call has been backed by MPs from a range of parties, including Tory grandee Sir David Davis, Labour’s Lloyd Hatton and Liberal Democrat justice spokeswoman Jess Brown-Fuller.
Sir David said Slapps were “a grave threat to free speech here in the UK” and cost the justice system “millions of pounds”.
Mr Hatton said they were “abusive tactics” that prevented “journalists, whistleblowers and campaigners from shining a light on suspected corruption or foul play”, while Ms Brown-Fuller said the Government must legislate if it is “serious about protecting victims”.
The UK Anti-Slapp Coalition has pointed to small media outlets, including student papers, being threatened with legal action over their reporting at a time when economic challenges made them less able to deal with the potential costs.
Coalition co-chair Nik Williams said: “Local journalism is the lifeblood of democracy, and if an outlet feels unable to cover a story because of legal threats, issues of real public importance can disappear from scrutiny altogether.”
Justice Secretary David Lammy was a vocal supporter of tougher laws against Slapps while in opposition.
But since coming to power Labour has shied away from introducing standalone legislation to end the practice, so far only activating provisions passed by the previous government to tackle the issue in 2023.
Justice sources have stressed the need to strike a balance between access to justice and freedom of speech.
Coalition founder Susan Coughtrie said: “Despite leading the charge in opposition to bring forward universal anti-Slapp legislation, press reports imply the Government has now shelved plans to legislate, which if true is extremely disappointing particularly given the significant cross-party support.
Anything that threatens the ability of the media and others to carry out their job is a threat to civil liberties and democracy. The government needs to act. “The longer the delay to take action, the longer the system will remain open for abuse.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
I am happy to address most contributions, even the drunken ones if they are coherent, but I am not going to engage with negative sniping from those who do not have the guts to add their names or a consistent on-line identity to their comments. Such postings will not be published.
Anonymous comments with a constructive contribution to make to the discussion, even if it is critical will continue to be posted. Libellous comments or remarks I think may be libellous will not be published.
I will also not tolerate personation so please do not add comments in the name of real people unless you are that person. If you do not like these rules then start your own blog.
Oh, and if you persist in repeating yourself despite the fact I have addressed your point I may get bored and reject your comment.
The views expressed in comments are those of the poster, not me.