The broadcaster says that Gilestone Farm in Powys was originally bought for £4.75m but plans to help Green Man festival's owners were abandoned when ospreys started nesting there. Now, a Senedd committee report has raised "serious concerns" over how the site was acquired, and demanded a review:
Then-economy minister Vaughan Gething said the government was "delighted" in early 2024 by the arrival of two nesting ospreys at Gilestone Farm.
But the discovery brought an end to a scheme which could have seen the businesswoman behind Green Man expand to a new site.
Gething, who later had a short stint as first minister during the same year, denied wasting money.
Under the proposals the main music and arts festival would have remained at Crickhowell, but a company set up by Green Man's director Fiona Stewart wanted to use the farm for other events.
Opposition politicians had criticised the purchase of the farm - with officials entering negotiations to lease it to Ms Stewart - without an initial business plan.
After the discovery of the ospreys, a 750m (2,460ft) restricted zone was advised around the nest itself, which can be viewed live on the internet, external.
An audit report previously found that using up unspent money by the end of the financial year was the "most significant" factor in why the site was bought.
The property is currently leased to a farm on "commercial terms".
In a critical report, the Senedd's public accounts and administration committee said the decision was taken with a "lack of thorough due diligence".
Plans were "not sufficiently robust and had not been communicated effectively to the community", it said.
It added a failure to keep an adequate record of meetings with Green Man officials meant the Senedd was "unable to fully scrutinise and evaluate decisions taken by the Welsh government".
Decision-makers in the Welsh government were also not provided information about the purchase in a "timely manner", the report said.
The committee said the "haste" that the government bought the site in may have also inhibited its ability to identify risks around the presence of wildlife "that would affect its proposals for the site, and potentially, its value".
"This is particularly notable as the site has now been valued at £3.75m, meaning that the Welsh government's asset has lost half a million pounds in value," the report said.
It is difficult to disagee with the comments of Adam Price that this saga is proof of Labour's mismanagement of the public purse.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I am happy to address most contributions, even the drunken ones if they are coherent, but I am not going to engage with negative sniping from those who do not have the guts to add their names or a consistent on-line identity to their comments. Such postings will not be published.
Anonymous comments with a constructive contribution to make to the discussion, even if it is critical will continue to be posted. Libellous comments or remarks I think may be libellous will not be published.
I will also not tolerate personation so please do not add comments in the name of real people unless you are that person. If you do not like these rules then start your own blog.
Oh, and if you persist in repeating yourself despite the fact I have addressed your point I may get bored and reject your comment.
The views expressed in comments are those of the poster, not me.