The Mirror reports that the Prime Minister is expected to name around 30 new peers on Thursday - with a gong for former aide Sue Gray. This is despite a manifesto commitment to slim down this unelected body:
Despite commitment to reform the Lords, the Government is concerned about getting legislation through the upper chamber.
There are currently 273 Tories, 187 Labour, 78 Lib Dems and 184 cross-benchers, meaning no party has a majority.
Ms Gray, who hit the headlines when she led a probe into Partygate, quit as the PM’s chief of staff in October after a slew of internal rows.
She is expected to be among a string of appointments of Labour figures, which are believed to outnumber the Tory peerages that will also be announced.
Tom Brake, Director of Unlock Democracy, said Labour needed to stick to its commitment not to pack out the Lords.
He said: "We hope at least that all new peers will be committed to wholesale reform of the Lords. This would provide some consolation for their swelling numbers.
“Although new appointees to the Lords will now have to be ‘justified’, this falls far short of Labour’s pre-election pledges.
"At the very least, the government must rapidly deliver on its manifesto promise of a proper consultation on the future of the Lords.”
It is the same old story, a Prime Minister who cannot let go of the opportunity for patronage that the House of Lords offers him, eschewing democratic reform in the process.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I am happy to address most contributions, even the drunken ones if they are coherent, but I am not going to engage with negative sniping from those who do not have the guts to add their names or a consistent on-line identity to their comments. Such postings will not be published.
Anonymous comments with a constructive contribution to make to the discussion, even if it is critical will continue to be posted. Libellous comments or remarks I think may be libellous will not be published.
I will also not tolerate personation so please do not add comments in the name of real people unless you are that person. If you do not like these rules then start your own blog.
Oh, and if you persist in repeating yourself despite the fact I have addressed your point I may get bored and reject your comment.
The views expressed in comments are those of the poster, not me.