Judging by their approach to EU trade talks the Tory Government are putting a lot of faith in a deal with Donald Trump's America, however is their confidence misplaced in thinking that such a deal at the expense of our arrangements with the European Union is worth it?
An official document from the Department of International Trade seems to think that there is a great deal of self-delusion on the part of Ministers in pursing this approach.
As the Independent reports, the government's own figures show that the economic benefit from a trade deal with the US may be as little as 0.02 per cent of GDP – around 450 times smaller than the potential loss from a no-deal Brexit.
The paper adds that citics of Boris Johnson's Brexit strategy pointed out that this i only a tiny fraction of the hit to GDP expected in the case EU withdrawal without a trade deal, which the government has previously estimated at up to 9 per cent:
The DIT document set out two “plausible” outcomes from the planned US talks – a more limited deal delivering “substantial” tariff liberalisation and a 25 per cent reduction in non-tariff barriers, and a deeper arrangement with “full” tariff liberalisation and a 50 per cent reduction in non-tariff barriers.
Under the first scenario, DIT put the likely benefit to UK GDP at between £0.5bn and £3.1bn (0.02-0.15 per cent), with a central estimate of £1.6bn (0.07 per cent).
Under the second, UK GDP could increase by £1bn-£7.7bn (0.05-0.36 per cent), with a central estimate of £3.4bn (0.16 per cent of GDP).
By comparison, the government’s most recent estimate of the cost of Brexit to the UK economy, published in 2018, suggested that a Canada-style free trade agreement could hit GDP by between 3.4 and 6.4 per cent, while a no-deal Brexit – referred to by Mr Johnson as an “Australian-style agreement” – would cost the economy between 6.3 and 9 per cent of GDP.
That is a pretty high cliff edge Boris Johnson is driving us towards.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I am happy to address most contributions, even the drunken ones if they are coherent, but I am not going to engage with negative sniping from those who do not have the guts to add their names or a consistent on-line identity to their comments. Such postings will not be published.
Anonymous comments with a constructive contribution to make to the discussion, even if it is critical will continue to be posted. Libellous comments or remarks I think may be libellous will not be published.
I will also not tolerate personation so please do not add comments in the name of real people unless you are that person. If you do not like these rules then start your own blog.
Oh, and if you persist in repeating yourself despite the fact I have addressed your point I may get bored and reject your comment.
The views expressed in comments are those of the poster, not me.