Pages

▼

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

No publicity

This report by the Taxpayers Alliance raises a number of questions but the one that is nagging at me is this: If Flintshire spent one million and ninety three thousand pounds in 2005-06 and presumably similar sums subsequently on publicity, then how is it that they never have any good news stories in the media?
at

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous10:01 PM

    Could the reason be that the money was primarily spent on informing the public about services & consulting on priorities rather than on glossy PR? Not every book can be judged by its cover.

    ReplyDelete

I am happy to address most contributions, even the drunken ones if they are coherent, but I am not going to engage with negative sniping from those who do not have the guts to add their names or a consistent on-line identity to their comments. Such postings will not be published.

Anonymous comments with a constructive contribution to make to the discussion, even if it is critical will continue to be posted. Libellous comments or remarks I think may be libellous will not be published.

I will also not tolerate personation so please do not add comments in the name of real people unless you are that person. If you do not like these rules then start your own blog.

Oh, and if you persist in repeating yourself despite the fact I have addressed your point I may get bored and reject your comment.

The views expressed in comments are those of the poster, not me.