Welsh Liberal Democrats Councillor for Cwmbwrla Ward, City and County of Swansea - Please buy my novels at Author Page
Pages
Friday, February 20, 2026
Are Starmer's defence spending promises enough?
The paper says that an open letter to the prime minister, signed by three ex-defence secretaries, retired senior military chiefs, and former MI6 head Sir Richard Dearlove, argues that the UK faces a “1936 moment”, with global conflict likely amid rising tensions and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine:
The letter, published in The Telegraph, calls for defence spending to reach 5 per cent of GDP.
This contrasts with Sir Keir Starmer’s pledge to increase it to 2.5 per cent next year and 3 per cent after the next election.
“Our actions fall dangerously short of matching this rhetoric and of meeting our treaty obligations,” the letter reads.
“We are deluding ourselves if we believe Russia and our other adversaries are unaware of this.”
The letter says the UK is ‘deluded’ to think that adversaries aren’t aware of defence budget shortfalls
The government has yet to publish its delayed defence investment plan (DIP), setting out how it will meet its commitments.
The prime minister’s spokesperson insisted on Monday that the Ministry of Defence (MoD) was working “flat-out” to deliver the plan “as soon as possible”.
The open letter urged Sir Keir to “commit now to a bold, credible and measurable path to spending 5 per cent of GDP on core defence, providing the certainty our Armed Forces, industry, and our long-standing allies need to deter aggression and secure Britain’s future”.
“You must recognise that we are facing our 1936 moment: global conflict is highly likely if we don’t invest in deterrence now.”
In January, Downing Street refused to deny reports that the MoD faces a shortfall of up to £28bn amid suggestions that a budget black hole had prompted Sir Keir to order an overhaul of the investment plan.
“Recent reports highlight that your Government appears in denial over a stark reality: The Ministry of Defence faces a £28 billion shortfall over the coming years simply to make Britain’s Armed Forces ‘war-ready,’” the letter read.
“This gap—equivalent to nearly half the MoD’s annual budget—threatens to leave our forces under-equipped and overstretched at a time when readiness, already a weakness, is paramount.”
None of this explains where the money is going to come from to meet even Starmer's promises, never mind the sort of expenditure demanded by this letter. Let's hope that the next budget event starts to explain how these objectives will be met.
1 comment:
I am happy to address most contributions, even the drunken ones if they are coherent, but I am not going to engage with negative sniping from those who do not have the guts to add their names or a consistent on-line identity to their comments. Such postings will not be published.
Anonymous comments with a constructive contribution to make to the discussion, even if it is critical will continue to be posted. Libellous comments or remarks I think may be libellous will not be published.
I will also not tolerate personation so please do not add comments in the name of real people unless you are that person. If you do not like these rules then start your own blog.
Oh, and if you persist in repeating yourself despite the fact I have addressed your point I may get bored and reject your comment.
The views expressed in comments are those of the poster, not me.

We are at a crossroad, as in 1936. ANY govnt must consider where the money will come from for our defence. The amount of money needed is large. A SERIOUS thought has to be considered in RAISING TAXES to get the money (and also to put into Council services etc,that we all rely on). LibDem bond idea can be a starter to build on. If the 30s is anything to go on we have about 3 years to develop our defences.
ReplyDelete