Thursday, April 08, 2021
Home Office to continue sending asylum seekers to unsuitable camps
After a significant Covid outbreak in which 50% of the near 400 residents of the Napier barracks site in Kent fell sick, multiple outstanding legal challenges, the closure of a sister site in Pembrokeshire and months of revelations over the suitability of the camp, one would have hoped that the Home Office had learnt its lesson. Asylum seekers are human beings fleeing war, torture, starvation, the effects of climate change and persecution, and they should be treated accordingly.
However, the Guardian reports that a new intake of asylum seekers will be sent to the controversial Napier barracks from Friday, despite mounting evidence the camp is not suitable for accommodation.
The paper says it has seen correspondence confirming that Clearsprings Ready Homes, the private contractor that runs the site on behalf of the Home Office, intends to bring in new arrivals from Friday:
The decision comes after a significant Covid outbreak in which 50% of the near 400 residents fell sick, multiple outstanding legal challenges, the closure of a sister site in Pembrokeshire and months of revelations over the suitability of the camp.
Critics expressed anger and disappointment over the Home Office’s decision to persevere with the use of the former Ministry of Defence (MoD) site.
Stuart McDonald, SNP MP and member of the home affairs select committee, said: “The Home Office doesn’t need to use these dilapidated former barracks to accommodate people fleeing war and violence but are choosing to do so anyway – despite a damning inspection and the ongoing pandemic. That choice is a political one.
“The whole Home Office machine is hell-bent on ensuring life for people seeking refuge is as miserable as possible in the hope it will put off others from applying for refugee status. The use of these dilapidated barracks is shocking and shameful – but it is consistent with everything else the Home Office is doing.”
Earlier this year, the high court heard that the Home Office ignored Public Health England advice that the dormitory-style accommodation at Napier barracks, which holds up to 28 men in a single block, was not suitable during the pandemic.
And HM Inspectorate of Prisons and the independent chief inspector of Borders and Immigration published a damning report following inspections of Napier and the now-closed Penally camp, branding the sites “filthy” and “impoverished”.
Enver Solomon, chief executive of the Refugee Council, said: “Local agencies in Kent and independent inspectors have all concluded that the barracks are unfit to house anybody. It’s shocking that the government is ignoring this and continuing to treat people who have experienced great trauma in their lives with a complete lack of compassion and humanity.”
Dr Jill O’Leary, lead doctor for the medical advisory advice at the Helen Bamber Foundation, who assessed former residents of Napier barracks, said: “We have consistently seen the threat these former military sites pose to the physical and mental health of residents. We have witnessed a devastating Covid-19 outbreak due to the dormitory-style accommodation, not to mention mental health crises, self-harm and suicide attempts as a result of the unsuitability of the environment.
“The Helen Bamber Foundation gave evidence to the home affairs select committee in February detailing the level of suffering that existed in these sites. The news that the Home Office are moving vulnerable asylum seekers back into Napier in the face of this evidence is deeply distressing to all involved.
“I anticipate further needless and preventable suffering of vulnerable people as a result of this decision.”
So the descent of the UK Government into a Hungarian-style popularist dictatorship continues.
However, the Guardian reports that a new intake of asylum seekers will be sent to the controversial Napier barracks from Friday, despite mounting evidence the camp is not suitable for accommodation.
The paper says it has seen correspondence confirming that Clearsprings Ready Homes, the private contractor that runs the site on behalf of the Home Office, intends to bring in new arrivals from Friday:
The decision comes after a significant Covid outbreak in which 50% of the near 400 residents fell sick, multiple outstanding legal challenges, the closure of a sister site in Pembrokeshire and months of revelations over the suitability of the camp.
Critics expressed anger and disappointment over the Home Office’s decision to persevere with the use of the former Ministry of Defence (MoD) site.
Stuart McDonald, SNP MP and member of the home affairs select committee, said: “The Home Office doesn’t need to use these dilapidated former barracks to accommodate people fleeing war and violence but are choosing to do so anyway – despite a damning inspection and the ongoing pandemic. That choice is a political one.
“The whole Home Office machine is hell-bent on ensuring life for people seeking refuge is as miserable as possible in the hope it will put off others from applying for refugee status. The use of these dilapidated barracks is shocking and shameful – but it is consistent with everything else the Home Office is doing.”
Earlier this year, the high court heard that the Home Office ignored Public Health England advice that the dormitory-style accommodation at Napier barracks, which holds up to 28 men in a single block, was not suitable during the pandemic.
And HM Inspectorate of Prisons and the independent chief inspector of Borders and Immigration published a damning report following inspections of Napier and the now-closed Penally camp, branding the sites “filthy” and “impoverished”.
Enver Solomon, chief executive of the Refugee Council, said: “Local agencies in Kent and independent inspectors have all concluded that the barracks are unfit to house anybody. It’s shocking that the government is ignoring this and continuing to treat people who have experienced great trauma in their lives with a complete lack of compassion and humanity.”
Dr Jill O’Leary, lead doctor for the medical advisory advice at the Helen Bamber Foundation, who assessed former residents of Napier barracks, said: “We have consistently seen the threat these former military sites pose to the physical and mental health of residents. We have witnessed a devastating Covid-19 outbreak due to the dormitory-style accommodation, not to mention mental health crises, self-harm and suicide attempts as a result of the unsuitability of the environment.
“The Helen Bamber Foundation gave evidence to the home affairs select committee in February detailing the level of suffering that existed in these sites. The news that the Home Office are moving vulnerable asylum seekers back into Napier in the face of this evidence is deeply distressing to all involved.
“I anticipate further needless and preventable suffering of vulnerable people as a result of this decision.”
So the descent of the UK Government into a Hungarian-style popularist dictatorship continues.
