Sunday, June 07, 2020
UK government's indefinite detention of immigrants is cruel and barbaric
Tory MP David Davis has hit out at his own Home Secretary, warning that the “cruel” indefinite detention of immigrants is making the scandal of modern slavery worse.
As the Independent reports, the former Conservative cabinet minister has urged the Priti Patel to stop holding people charged with no crime for months or even years – warning of its “devastating” psychological impact. Two other former Tory ministers are demanding an end to the practice, in a vote expected in July, with others expected to join them in calling for a strict 28-day limit instead:
Mr Davis highlighted the case of Anna, a Chinese woman who fled her home after her husband was sentenced to death, as he stressed most detainees are “victims of human trafficking, sexual assault and torture”, not criminals.
Told she was being taken elsewhere in China, Anna was trafficked to the UK, “where she was forced into prostitution and several years of unpaid work – slavery by another name”.
She was then arrested during a raid and taken to Yarl’s Wood, one of 10 removal centres, where she was held indefinitely – one of 25,000 people held each year for immigration purposes.
“Anna’s story is not an isolated case,” Mr Davis said, adding: “There are all sorts of cruelties involved. “These people, unlike people who are given a prison sentence, they don’t know when they are going to get out – and that is psychologically devastating.”
And he added: “I know only too well that all the advice the home secretary will be getting from the Home Office bureaucracy will be to resist this, but I ask them to look at the natural justice of this.
“We are a country which prides itself on its justice system. Yet, on the one hand we are supposedly campaigning against modern slavery, but – in the way we operate our holding centres – in some ways, we are exacerbating it.”
The paper says that Davis' criticism echoes research that trafficked women – instead of being offered help, as promised – are being locked up for possible deportation, inflicting more trauma. Britain has faced growing criticism, including from the UN Human Rights Council, for being the only EU country without a statutory time limit for the detention of immigrants.
They add that survivors of torture, trafficking and rape are among those held in overcrowded centres – for months, or even years – where an investigation last year uncovered “widespread self-harm and attempted suicides”.
David Davis will be seeking to amend the immigration bill, which ends free movement after Brexit, to impose a strict 28-day limit. His amendment would also introduce judicial oversight of detention after four days and establish much clearer criteria for taking someone into a removal centre. He has the support of Andrew Mitchell, the former international development secretary, and former Brexit minister Steve Baker.
What is shocking however, is that this amendment is even needed. To treat victims of trafficking, torture, slavery and rape in this way is inhumane, cruel and barbaric. Is this the real reason why the Tories want to opt out of human rights treaties? Do they have no respect for human rights at all?
As the Independent reports, the former Conservative cabinet minister has urged the Priti Patel to stop holding people charged with no crime for months or even years – warning of its “devastating” psychological impact. Two other former Tory ministers are demanding an end to the practice, in a vote expected in July, with others expected to join them in calling for a strict 28-day limit instead:
Mr Davis highlighted the case of Anna, a Chinese woman who fled her home after her husband was sentenced to death, as he stressed most detainees are “victims of human trafficking, sexual assault and torture”, not criminals.
Told she was being taken elsewhere in China, Anna was trafficked to the UK, “where she was forced into prostitution and several years of unpaid work – slavery by another name”.
She was then arrested during a raid and taken to Yarl’s Wood, one of 10 removal centres, where she was held indefinitely – one of 25,000 people held each year for immigration purposes.
“Anna’s story is not an isolated case,” Mr Davis said, adding: “There are all sorts of cruelties involved. “These people, unlike people who are given a prison sentence, they don’t know when they are going to get out – and that is psychologically devastating.”
And he added: “I know only too well that all the advice the home secretary will be getting from the Home Office bureaucracy will be to resist this, but I ask them to look at the natural justice of this.
“We are a country which prides itself on its justice system. Yet, on the one hand we are supposedly campaigning against modern slavery, but – in the way we operate our holding centres – in some ways, we are exacerbating it.”
The paper says that Davis' criticism echoes research that trafficked women – instead of being offered help, as promised – are being locked up for possible deportation, inflicting more trauma. Britain has faced growing criticism, including from the UN Human Rights Council, for being the only EU country without a statutory time limit for the detention of immigrants.
They add that survivors of torture, trafficking and rape are among those held in overcrowded centres – for months, or even years – where an investigation last year uncovered “widespread self-harm and attempted suicides”.
David Davis will be seeking to amend the immigration bill, which ends free movement after Brexit, to impose a strict 28-day limit. His amendment would also introduce judicial oversight of detention after four days and establish much clearer criteria for taking someone into a removal centre. He has the support of Andrew Mitchell, the former international development secretary, and former Brexit minister Steve Baker.
What is shocking however, is that this amendment is even needed. To treat victims of trafficking, torture, slavery and rape in this way is inhumane, cruel and barbaric. Is this the real reason why the Tories want to opt out of human rights treaties? Do they have no respect for human rights at all?
